전문가를 위한 통합 시뮬레이션

이 교육 패키지는 응집장 시뮬레이션 전문가를 위한 것입니다. 이 패키지에는 Abaqus 기능을 활용한 탄성 및 손상 영역 시뮬레이션, UMAT 서브루틴을 사용한 탄성 및 손상 영역 시뮬레이션, 그리고 USDFLD 서브루틴을 사용한 응집 피로 시뮬레이션이 포함되어 있습니다.

당신이 배울 것

tes1
tes2
tes3

tes4
tes5
tes6

Buy Together & Save

15%

전문가를 위한 통합 시뮬레이션

가격 범위: € 2000.0~€ 4000.0

Comprehensive Manufacturing System Simulation Using FLEXSIM

원래 가격: € 580.0.현재 가격: € 464.0.

~~유로 2464.0~~ 유로 2094.4

You Save

15%

This Course 포함

강의 콘텐츠

전문가를 위한 통합 시뮬레이션

Lesson Test1

12h 45min

제품 Informations

전문가를 위한 통합 시뮬레이션

This educational package is used for experts in cohesive field simulation. This package includes simulation of elastic and damage area by Abaqus capabilities, Using UMAT subroutine for elastic and damage region and simulation of cohesive fatigue with USDFLD subroutine. In the following, there are more explanations regarding the package headings.
1- Cohesive simulation in elastic and damage region using Abaqus capabilities
This chapter is actually “ABAQUS에서 상호작용 및 요소 기반 방법을 통한 응집력 구현” package and can be purchased separately. A full description of this chapter is available at 이 링크.
2- Simulation of the elastic and damage region by UMAT subroutine
Sometimes, it is necessary to make minor changes in the parameters of the elastic or cohesive damage so that we can implement other models provided for cohesive in the software. For this, first, it is necessary to implement the main software model by the subroutine. In this chapter, first, the elastic and damage theory of cohesive material is explained. Then, the flowchart of the UMAT subroutine is described part by part, and the subroutine is written line by line with the complete explanation. Finally, the written subroutine is implemented on a simple joint and verified with the results of the Abaqus software in elastic and damaged areas.
3- Cohesive fatigue simulation
Due to the fact that cohesive is used in various joints, it fails along with other parts under fatigue loading. Since the fatigue of cohesive is not presented as an option in the Abaqus software, it is necessary to write a subroutine to implement this behavior. In this chapter, fatigue based on 호라미샤드의 모델 has been implemented in the USDFLD subroutine and used on a single joint connection. In this part of the package, firstly, the theory of cohesive fatigue based on the article is explained completely along with all related equations. Then, the flowchart of the subroutine is organized. Finally, the subroutine is written line-by-line and implemented on the model.

Package-1: Cohesive simulation in elastic and damage region using Abaqus capabilities

[woodmart_list icon_library=”openiconic” woodmart_css_id=”633aaaa948d99″ list=”%5B%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22Where%20can%20we%20use%20cohesive%20behavior%3F%5CnDifferent%20methods%20to%20simulate%20cohesive%20behavior.%5CnLimitations%20to%20simulate%20cohesive%20behavior%20in%20different%20methods%5CnTraction-separation%20formula%20for%20cohesive%20behavior%5CnDamage%20initiation%20criteria%20for%20cohesive%20in%20traction-separation%20law%5CnCriteria%20of%20progressive%20damage%20behavior%20in%20cohesive%20materials%5CnUsage%20Limitation%20of%20element-based%20cohesive%20modeling%5CnElement%20based%20method%20for%20cohesive%20material%20in%20continuum%20element%5CnElement%20based%20method%20for%20cohesive%20material%20in%20traction-separation%20law%5CnSettings%20for%20initial%20thickness%20of%20cohesive%20with%20traction-separation%20law%5CnDifferent%20types%20of%20cohesive%20elements%5CnOutputs%20for%20cohesive%20element%5CnViscous%20regulation%20for%20cohesive%20element%5CnUsage%20limitation%20of%20surface-based%20method%20for%20cohesive%20modeling%5CnElement-based%20method%20vs%20surface-based%20method%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22Workshop%201%3A%20Simulation%20Single%20Lap%20joint%20under%20tension%5CnProblem%20description%5CnHow%20to%20define%20traction-separation%20elastic%20behavior%20for%20cohesive%20elements%5CnWhat%20is%20the%20procedure%20to%20model%20cohesive%20via%20element%20based%20method%5CnHow%20to%20define%20damage%20initiation%20based%20on%20QUADS%20damage%5CnHow%20to%20apply%20initial%20thickness%20settings%5CnHow%20to%20assemble%20cohesive%20parts%20and%20other%20parts%5CnHow%20to%20define%20outputs%20for%20cohesive%20elements%5CnSettings%20in%20different%20module%20for%20cohesive%20behavior%20definition%5CnCohesive%20element%20settings%20in%20mesh%20module%5CnHow%20to%20see%20the%20result%20of%20damage%20initiation%20for%20cohesive%20materials%5CnPlot%20damage%20initiation%20criterion%20vs%20time%20for%20critical%20element%5CnPlot%20damage%20parameter%20vs%20time%20for%20critical%20element%5CnPlot%20stress%20vs%20strain%20for%20critical%20element%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22Workshop%202%3A%20Simulation%20of%20masonry%20wall%20in%20Abaqus%5CnProblem%20Description%5CnSettings%20to%20solve%20convergence%20problem%20in%20implicit%20solver%5CnSettings%20to%20remove%20element%20in%20visualization%20module%5CnSuitable%20method%20to%20simulate%20cohesive%20behavior%20between%20bricks%20and%20masonry%20wall%5CnSuitable%20method%20to%20simulate%20cohesive%20behavior%20between%20bricks%20and%20masonry%20wall%5CnHow%20to%20define%20Concrete%20damage%20plasticity%20behavior(CDP)%5CnUsing%20mass%20scale%20to%20increase%20simulation%20speed%5CnOutput%20settings%20for%20cohesive%20surface%20behavior%5CnSettings%20to%20define%20cohesive%20behavior%20via%20surface-based%20method%20in%20explicit%20solver%5CnHow%20to%20apply%20pressure%20when%20equivalent%20force%20in%20known%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22Workshop%203%3A%20Debonding%20behavior%20of%20a%20double%20cantilever%20beam%5CnProblem%20description%5CnSettings%20to%20define%20cohesive%20behavior%20via%20surface-based%20method%20in%20implicit%20solver%5CnPlot%20force%20vs%20displacement%20in%20debonding%20of%20DCB(double%20cantilever%20beam)%5CnHow%20to%20model%20damage%20initiation%20and%20progressive%20damage%20for%20cohesive%20in%20surface-based%20method%22%7D%5D” icon_openiconic=”vc-oi vc-oi-play” icons_color=”eyJwYXJhbV90eXBlIjoid29vZG1hcnRfY29sb3JwaWNrZXIiLCJjc3NfYXJncyI6eyJjb2xvciI6WyIgLmxpc3QtaWNvbiJdfSwic2VsZWN0b3JfaWQiOiI2MzNhYWFhOTQ4ZDk5IiwiZGF0YSI6eyJkZXNrdG9wIjoiI2Y1ODYzNCJ9fQ==”]

Package-2: Simulation of the elastic and damage region by UMAT subroutine

[woodmart_list icon_library=”openiconic” woodmart_css_id=”633aac089a0e5″ list=”%5B%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22Providing%20equation%20of%20elastic%20behavior%20of%20adhesive%20materials%5Cn%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22Providing%20the%20damage%20initiation%20and%20progressive%20damage%20equations%20of%20adhesive%20materials%20based%20on%20energy%20criteria%5Cn%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22Subroutine%20explanation%20line%20by%20line%5Cn%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22subroutine%20Implementation%20in%20simple%20joint%5Cn%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22Validation%20of%20the%20results%20by%20comparison%20with%20Abaqus%20simulation%5Cn%22%7D%5D” icon_openiconic=”vc-oi vc-oi-play” icons_color=”eyJwYXJhbV90eXBlIjoid29vZG1hcnRfY29sb3JwaWNrZXIiLCJjc3NfYXJncyI6eyJjb2xvciI6WyIgLmxpc3QtaWNvbiJdfSwic2VsZWN0b3JfaWQiOiI2MzNhYWMwODlhMGU1IiwiZGF0YSI6eyJkZXNrdG9wIjoiI2Y1ODYzNCJ9fQ==”]

Package-3: Cohesive fatigue simulation with USDFLD subroutine

[woodmart_list icon_library=”openiconic” woodmart_css_id=”633aac698377a” list=”%5B%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22How%20to%20write%20a%20subroutine%20for%20the%20evolution%20of%20the%20damage%20and%20the%20cohesive%20damage%3F%5Cn%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22How%20to%20create%20fatigue%20cycles%20in%20each%20step%3F%5Cn%22%7D%2C%7B%22list-content%22%3A%22How%20to%20omit%20damaged%20cohesive%20element%20in%20a%20single%20lap%20joint%3F%5Cn%22%7D%5D” icon_openiconic=”vc-oi vc-oi-play” icons_color=”eyJwYXJhbV90eXBlIjoid29vZG1hcnRfY29sb3JwaWNrZXIiLCJjc3NfYXJncyI6eyJjb2xvciI6WyIgLmxpc3QtaWNvbiJdfSwic2VsZWN0b3JfaWQiOiI2MzNhYWM2OTgzNzdhIiwiZGF0YSI6eyJkZXNrdG9wIjoiI2Y1ODYzNCJ9fQ==”]

item1
item2
item3

?Test Question1?

전문가를 위한 통합 시뮬레이션에 대한 3개 상품평

5 규정 5로 평가됨

mei – 2023년 1월 17일

정말 좋았어요! 더 연습할 수 있는 방법이 있을까요?
5 규정 5로 평가됨

maria-8273 – 2023년 1월 17일

It seems to be a good package but isn’t that a little expensive for just one workshop?
5 규정 5로 평가됨

rauf – 2023년 1월 29일

The course was well-defined, and each section was explained in a way that helped the user comprehend the concept. thanks.